Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VF_K3405VF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VF_K3405VF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3405VF
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 11:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 164
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 485
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3048) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 19.7
13% 18.5 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 16.5
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 999 989 1133 1226 1133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,171
Write 890
Mixed 817
SusWrite 1,064
221% 986 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 37.3
153% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 589
422% 556 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 182%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1441
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VF_K3405VF Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VF_K3405VF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback