HP 348 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 348 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86CE
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 04:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 178
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 391
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 86CE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.1
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 1805 1358 1118 1756 1833 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,876
Write 2,374
Mixed 2,027
SusWrite 1,598
445% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.1
233% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 565
407% 529 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 268%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP Adata 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN142C
Typical 348 G7 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 348 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback