Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191007
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 01:41
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 808
88% 695 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 153
Parallax 154
126% 154 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2168 2225 2283 2355 2361 1420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 2,258
Mixed 2,124
SusWrite 2,135
510% 2,269 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 81.7
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,577
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,487
1,069% 1,386 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 383%
Great: 623%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
76GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 133 132 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 337
Mixed 330
SusWrite 168
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 52.4
188% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 178
184% 300 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
15GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 377
Mixed 377
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 51.6
185% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 177
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
479GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 71 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 70
Write 59.1
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 68.8
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 57%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
696GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 140 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 158
Write 135
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 140
83% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
342% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST92505610AS 250GB
222GB free
Firmware: SD25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 94 93 92 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 84.8
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 92.8
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GRBB F4-3000C15-4GRBB F4-3000C15-8GRBB F4-3000C15-4GRBB 24GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback