Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '24 at 21:16
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 51.4 34% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 198 20% 165 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.2% Poor	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 50.8 Parallax 63.2 9% 41.5 fps	MRender 56.6 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 68.8 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 15 33 14 18 32 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.1% Very poor	Read 55.3 Write 29.7 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 28.2 7% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 7.7 28% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 114 89% 123 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 318GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 48GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 11 19 32 28 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 50.4 Mixed 20 SusWrite 29.3 25% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Kingmax FLGF65F-D8KQB 8GB 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.4% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	31.5"	1280 720	ACR0917 ED322Q P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	5x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	4x

GPU
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	3x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	3x

RAM
9905402-174.A00G 9905402-174.A00G 99U5584-009.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 43%, 5 samples	3x
99U5471-004.A01LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 34%, 14 samples	3x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16