Asus B85M-K PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-K PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 19:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 95
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 483
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Zotac(19DA 1437) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 70
56% 81.8 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 65.2
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0240A 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM20.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 18 11 15 14 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 152
Write 97.6
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 92.4
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 8.7
40% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 15.4
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 50 7.2" 1768 969 SAM04FB SAMSUNG
Typical B85M-K PLUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-K PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback