Asus Pro H510M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro H510M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 16:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 780
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 122
Parallax 128
113% 129 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 107
Splatting 92.4
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0224A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 425
Mixed 412
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 32.2
152% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 48.8
85% 159 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
149GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.9
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 78.1
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 18.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical Pro H510M-C Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Pro H510M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback