HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 897B
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 14:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1245U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 65.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 315
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 805
83% 667 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 897B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 19.4
14% 18.6 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 25
Splatting 14.4
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 916 744 306 396 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,332
Write 887
Mixed 688
SusWrite 584
194% 873 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 52.3
165% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 491
343% 442 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 159%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 23 0 14" 1280 720 AUO229E
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback