HP 500-417ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-417ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 12:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 213
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 572
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 59.1
50% 71.5 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 57.3
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 289 289 214 110 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 450
Mixed 388
SusWrite 232
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 46.7
152% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
520GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 134 132 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 155
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 133
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1C1600C11 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F83 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical 500-417ng Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-417ng

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback