Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 07:02
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 124
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 822
78% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,218
75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 198
Parallax 190
146% 189 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 187
Splatting 129
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1541 1554 1513 1598 1623 1621 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,207
Write 1,906
Mixed 1955
SusWrite 1,575
430% 1,910 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 70.6
238% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 610
449% 594 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 284%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
444GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 416
Mixed 442
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 43.9
156% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 376
Mixed 339
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 25.5
83% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 179
132% 173 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
353GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1938
Write 1,578
Mixed 1,649
383% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 61.1
205% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 642
471% 620 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 122 120 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 122
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 85%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
967GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 182 178 171 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 153
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 181
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.7
372% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 139%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 110 107 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 110
140% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 54.5
MC Mixed 30.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC0D2 PHL 273V5
Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback