Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HD (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '24 at 01:33
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 77.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 660 75% 585 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 19.3 15% 19 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 17.4 14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD 1,296 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS103921 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 943 Write 1,170 Mixed 975 231% 1,029 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 193 4K Mixed 60.9 241% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 633 DQ Write 863 DQ Mixed 634 511% 710 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 223%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 36 Write 3.8 Mixed 8.4 14% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.4 138% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL22-22-22 D4-3200 1x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 20.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 20.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	58	30	60	18.5"	1366 768	AOC1950 1950W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	107x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	96x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	79x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	75x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	48x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	42x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	29x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	75x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16