Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 23:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 121
50% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 214
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 51.6
32% 41.5 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 350
Mixed 339
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 26.9
94% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 234
178% 241 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
304GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 129 127 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 146
Write 121
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 128
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]110(E/F) 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0A84 S24C230
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback