Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.6
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 21:03
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 200
2-Core 394
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 748
8-Core 1,221
120% 985 Pts
64-Core 1,851
115% 1,851 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1295) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 164
Parallax 164
151% 171 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
118% 152 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 132%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 130 124 333 113 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 2,064
Mixed 1,379
SusWrite 299
305% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 78.5
258% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 740
523% 675 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 195%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22S/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 36.6
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1774
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.6 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback