HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory25.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 19:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6134
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 851
77% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.9% Good
Lighting 82.3
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 86.4
67% 87.4 fps
MRender 89.2
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 96.8
76% 91.5 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 475 441 438 429 388 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 490
Mixed 432
SusWrite 446
168% 772 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 31.1
108% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 582
442% 599 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 156%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN3462 HP E243i
Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback