Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '24 at 17:32
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 39 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 102 36% 64 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 158 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% MSI(1462 3033) 2GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 49.4 32% 42.7 fps	MRender 33.6 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 28 26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 29%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 99 69 64 54 92 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 293 Write 110 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 75.8 31% 141 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 36.1 DQ Mixed 59.3 36% 38 MB/s	4K Write 20 4K Mixed 0.8 17% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050H 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 466GB free Firmware: ARF03H SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 72 98 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	52	60	21.5"	1280 720	PKB02F2 Maestro225DXL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16