Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 13:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 152
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 623
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1B0A 90F5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.70
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 9.2
7% 8.73 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 53 48 63 53 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 420
Write 85.3
Mixed 157
SusWrite 51.3
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 5.6
43% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 33.8
35% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 107
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 22.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 16.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 18.9" 1280 720 HWP3118 HP E190i
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback