Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 12:38
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 630
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 85.5
51% 70.2 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 72
Splatting 46.5
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 698
Write 642
Mixed 659
149% 666 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 60.5
194% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 919
661% 849 MB/s
Poor: 135% Great: 403%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
386GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 68
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 9905702-017.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 21.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 10% 60 205 58 60 21.5" 1536 864 SAM076D SMBX2231
Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback