TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H61M-HVGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HVGS  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 11:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 306
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 63.7%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.1% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 37.8
20% 31.3 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 32.1
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 23.1%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 127 143 153 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 172
Write 171
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 136
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 88.3%
 Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
53GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 70 83 83 94 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 83.5
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 52.7%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AXIOM MEMORY 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 23.6%
 Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 8 60 21.5" 1920 1017 ACI22D3 ASUS VS229
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples18x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples13x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples10x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples9x
GTX 550-TiNvidia  $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples12x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TBSeagateBench 112%, 7,008 samples3x
SSD 120GBGigabyte  $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples3x
RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples3x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback