Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory23.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 21:50
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 219
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 518
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 175
Parallax 177
143% 176 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 153
Splatting 143
137% 172 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 825GB
368GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 525
Write 131
Mixed 259
SusWrite 125
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 39.6
136% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 111
84% 112 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 126%
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade BQ78KHRHK9BKVA-X9Y BQ78KHRHK9BKVA-X9Y 28GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 39.2
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 32.9
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 144 0" 1280 720 BLD0E43 C24FG7x
Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback