Acer Aspire A515-48M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-48M  (all builds)
MotherboardBC Kelly_BCU
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230119
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 19:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 108
46% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 393
35% 296 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1688) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 19.7
7% 15.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 14.9
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,326
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,030
264% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 41.3
146% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 362
255% 328 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 448%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H54G56CYRBX247N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical Aspire A515-48M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A515-48M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback