HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887D
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230331
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 18:59
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 11.2
22% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 56.6
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 86
5% 86 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 887D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8983
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.7
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 43 21 60 11.6" 1280 720 AUO235C
Typical ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback