Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 15:07
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 708
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$600
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 247
Parallax 286
223% 269 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 230
Splatting 169
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 189%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 77 79 47 18 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 228
Write 189
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 58.4
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 29.9
70% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 16.5
47% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 100%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1157 1135 591 278 251 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,193
Write 1,071
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 606
231% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 67.8
225% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 979
701% 894 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 193%
Great: 290%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
127GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 135 141 140 142 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 141
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 24.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback