Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 09:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 274
82% 157 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 764
74% 611 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 21.7
13% 17.9 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 19.3
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 1397 315 316 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 315
Write 1,086
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 394
103% 454 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 8
26% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 19.8
74% 178 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 56%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU881-32N220A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 15% 79 66 45 60 27" 1920 1017 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback