AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 22:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 313
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 936
95% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,209
75% 1,209 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 44.2
21% 40.6 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-1TB 1TB
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2114 2306 2332 2532 2528 2069 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 2,584
Mixed 1,739
SusWrite 2,314
473% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 65.1
274% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 222
405% 809 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 341%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 43.8
136% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 32.2
104% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 128%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 49.8" 1280 720 PIO00BE PIONEER-PDP.
Typical SER Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback