MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 10:09
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 310
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 891
93% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 170
Parallax 161
151% 172 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
116% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 221 88 64 68 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 190
Mixed 227
SusWrite 120
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 44.2
165% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 209
174% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
723GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 115 151 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 87
SusWrite 144
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
823GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 95 93 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 93.2
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2133C14D4/4G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 120 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback