Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-A R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime20.4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 05:30
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 914
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 145
Parallax 196
104% 156 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 146
Splatting 97
97% 121 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTE220S 1TB
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B4SAUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 480 258 453 459 463 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 676
Mixed 683
SusWrite 443
143% 635 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 68.8
241% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 480
414% 616 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 162%
Great: 359%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
275GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 145
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 118
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
935GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 102 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 190
Write 149
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 99.1
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
365GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 118
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 39.9
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLB-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 28.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical PRIME H310M-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback