Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A2
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '24 at 19:31
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 188 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 451 49% 386 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 28 26% 33.9 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 34.2 Splatting 37.2 32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 552GB free (System drive) Firmware: 056 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 415 Write 364 Mixed 350 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 17.3 77% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 0.6 58% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Seagate FreeAgent 640GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 504GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,143 Write 8.2 Mixed 19.5 485% 723 MB/s	4K Read 225 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.1 940% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 18%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 2,760 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 19.7 Write 14.2 Mixed 9.5 17% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.3 65% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 21.3 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740B Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	14x
Xeon E5-1630 v4IntelBench 80%, 1,287 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	10x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	4x
MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 673 samples	4x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	3x

RAM
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 124 samples	7x
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 105%, 146 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $44Bench 71%, 7,248 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16