Asus PRIME B250M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-A  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 16:18
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 134
55% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 223
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 18.6
33% 34.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 38
Splatting 34.2
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 280 169 63 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 313
Write 276
Mixed 232
SusWrite 148
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 167
148% 220 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 87%
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1109 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 144 164 158 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 303
Write 145
Mixed 132
SusWrite 153
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 8.7
63% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 78.1
85% 141 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
143GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 97 108 100 113 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 104
Write 79.1
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 106
57% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
263GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 107 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 49.2
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 121
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 113%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 111 101 82 111 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 49.5
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 98.2
57% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 20 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0B47 S24D590
Typical PRIME B250M-A Builds (Compare 4,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-A - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback