Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9850H 9,974 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 594 62% 497 Pts	64-Core 680 42% 680 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro T2000 3,549 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Legend(17AA 2296) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3779 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 47 Parallax 36.1 28% 39.2 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 41.4 31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB 4,445 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 853GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11170101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,535 Write 1,497 Mixed 1,506 338% 1,513 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 59.5 197% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 796 DQ Write 517 DQ Mixed 650 487% 655 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 332%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 19.8 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	15.5"	1280 720	LEN4141

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

CPU
Core i7-9850HIntelBench 77%, 9,974 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	1x

RAM
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 78%, 423 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16