MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '24 at 14:13
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 86 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 646 71% 560 Pts	64-Core 656 41% 656 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.44% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 8.4 6% 6.83 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.44% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 475 Write 346 Mixed 323 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 87 DQ Write 46.5 DQ Mixed 23.3 29% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VX008-2AY10C 1TB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 51GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 110 132 76 64 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 33.2 Write 79.7 Mixed 112 SusWrite 99.8 61% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 334% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB 23,313 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.4 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 20.5 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	22	1	60	18.5"	1280 720	ACR019E Acer G195HQV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,336x
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,516x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	294x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	639x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	466x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	461x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	283x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	206x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	166x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16