Wortmann_ag FR1009561;2110127

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag FR1009561;2110127  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 09:44
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 803
81% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 155
Parallax 159
142% 163 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
111% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 260 260 260 260 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 457
Mixed 443
SusWrite 263
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 56.6
182% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 199
180% 272 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
877GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 739 747 757 760 759 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 772
Write 753
Mixed 688
SusWrite 751
167% 741 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 60.8
209% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 935
671% 860 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 178%
Great: 633%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
589GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 146 148 149 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 88.5
Write 79.6
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 148
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
315GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 118 117 115 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 118
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 108%
WD My Book 500GB
242GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 450
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 0.5
76% 114 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical FR1009561;2110127 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Wortmann_ag FR1009561;2110127

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $605
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback