PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Vostro 410 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0J584C |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080620 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 07 '24 at 02:42 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 12 12 13 14 MB/s
|
5.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 44 | 17 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | AOC2770 2770 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 14x |
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 3x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 4,070 samples | 5x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
Radeon HD 2400-PROATIBench 1%, 2,899 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $128 |