Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG FUSION 15 (XFU15L19)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG FUSION 15 (XFU15L19) (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel LAPQC71B
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '24 at 21:44
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 124 56% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 384 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Intel(8086 2087) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 6.6 5% 7.03 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 8.4 6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,307 Write 930 Mixed 922 233% 1,053 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 24 88% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 444 310% 393 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,613 Write 1,345 Mixed 1,280 314% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 28.5 103% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 253 185% 244 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 2x16GB 586 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	15.5"	1280 720	BOE084D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XMG FUSION 15 (XFU15L19) Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG FUSION 15 (XFU15L19)

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	187x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	77x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	66x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	43x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x
860 EVO M.2 1TBSamsungBench 110%, 27,887 samples	18x

RAM
CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GBCorsairBench 77%, 2,035 samples	37x
CM4X16GE2666C18S2 2x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 191 samples	26x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $93

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16