| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190524 |
| Uptime | 5.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 06 '24 at 19:58 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
83% 149 Pts
|
73% 580 Pts
|
42% 672 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.2%
Poor
|
0% 28.4 fps
|
68% 85.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron AFLD48EH1P 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.2%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
49% 81.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 3G 4B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 13% | 76 | 200 | 59 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | MSIABA4 MSI G2422 |
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,254 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,892x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 875x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 199x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 467x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 403x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 363x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $268 |