Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar T5XE CFX-SLI  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 19:58
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 128
59% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 234
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 100GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 29 29 32 31 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 121
Write 58.2
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 32.9
15% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 12.2
52% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 10
15% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 49%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
918GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 118 116 121 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 47 1 75 21.5" 1920 1017 ACR06AB SB220Q
Typical T5XE CFX-SLI Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback