MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 19:21
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 616
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 183
Parallax 175
134% 174 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 170
Splatting 117
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 60 621 99 66 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,410
Write 1,836
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 238
199% 894 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 6.4
78% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 237
173% 236 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 394%
Samsung 870 EVO 250G 250GB
50GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.1% Very poor
Read 19
Write 25.7
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 26.1
5% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 9
39% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 124 121 130 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 77.6
Write 129
Mixed 56
SusWrite 123
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 204 206 207 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 121
Write 146
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 204
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
342% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 8 60 30.1" 2560 1027 SAM0C63 SE790C
Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback