Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 13:52
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$324
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 985
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 299 292 254 195 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 316
Mixed 306
SusWrite 257
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 39.6
150% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 169
135% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung MMDOE56G5MXP-0VB 256GB
188GB free
Firmware: VBM1901Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 166 163 164 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 206
Write 167
Mixed 167
SusWrite 165
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 8.9
52% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 9
7% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
355GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 250 138 138 292 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 483
Write 156
Mixed 153
SusWrite 270
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 45
137% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 128%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID a306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 132 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 149
Write 123
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 134
136% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 24.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 23.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 25% 32 207 45 60 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback