Lenovo 82R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82R9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 13:00
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 210
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 572
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3806) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 18.5
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 15.3
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 150 92 80 75 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 848
Write 145
Mixed 245
SusWrite 96.7
72% 334 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 30.9
116% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 170
154% 244 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 26.5
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 60 14" 1344 840 LEN9125
Typical 82R9 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback