Acer Aspire A715-75G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A715-75G  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Azalea_FMS
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 12:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 110
53% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 189
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 5.8
5% 5.23 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ZEB-MN26 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3R0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 992 283 300 362 840 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 838
Write 1766
Mixed 917
SusWrite 530
230% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 39.5
131% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 272
180% 213 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 115%
Great: 142%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8ET 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUODF87
Typical Aspire A715-75G Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-75G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback