Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware IPMH310G 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH310G 2.0
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 07:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 591
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256G 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 431 432 432 313 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 409
Write 424
Mixed 350
SusWrite 374
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 35.2
122% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 70.3
94% 164 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 142%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
21GB free
Firmware: PC3ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 67
Write 66.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 52.3
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DDR4 8GB 3200MHz 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical IPMH310G 2.0 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $2,108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback