Intel X79Turbo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel X79
Motherboard	Intel X79Turbo (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '24 at 18:18
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 157 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 439 41% 340 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1462) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 36.1 29% 36.9 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 35 Splatting 26 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Bc501 NVMe SK hynix 256GB 8,328 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 831 Write 475 Mixed 356 122% 554 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 20.9 80% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 447 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 336 256% 351 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 142%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 92GB free Firmware: S1211A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 387 Write 308 Mixed 263 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 14.9 67% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 29.5 69% 137 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
Mass Storage Device 1TB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 557GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 55.3 Write 25.7 Mixed 24.6 39% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 59% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 1x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	47	60	23.5"	1920 1009	SAM0D2D C24F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79Turbo Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79Turbo

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	95x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	44x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	76x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	16x
M393B5170GB0- 3x4GBSamsungBench 73%, 90 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16