Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 13:17
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 612
69% 543 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 446 162 182 193 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,261
Write 927
Mixed 950
SusWrite 344
194% 870 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.2
221% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 547
423% 570 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 166%
Great: 169%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 188 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 188
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 188
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 120 24.1" 1280 720 ACR09F5 ED240Q S
Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback