Lenovo 81GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81GT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 06:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 415
46% 365 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 118 99 86 48 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 256
Write 107
Mixed 292
SusWrite 79.4
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 30.3
103% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 164
153% 234 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 100%
Nvme 512GB 512GB
75GB free
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 822 159 186 167 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,254
Write 1,190
Mixed 697
SusWrite 441
200% 895 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 20
121% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 448
385% 570 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 140%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 859B CB8GS2666.C8RT 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0563
Typical 81GT Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback