Lenovo 82R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82R9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 15:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 232
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 566
61% 483 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3806) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.72
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 15.7
8% 13.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 15.1
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 401 423 429 432 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 909
Mixed 949
SusWrite 455
195% 871 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 374
253% 316 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 124%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 29.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 58 60 14" 1280 720 LEN9125
Typical 82R9 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback