Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '24 at 13:56
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 240 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 669 72% 571 Pts	64-Core 684 42% 684 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 35.8 29% 38.9 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 25.1 26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S3SSDC256 256GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: H201126a SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 170 175 180 172 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 325 Write 174 Mixed 181 SusWrite 175 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 21.9 105% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 125 112% 169 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 105%
Hs-ssd-e100 1024G 1TB 1,315 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 287GB free Firmware: 030fAA20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 404 410 432 406 430 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 408 Write 424 Mixed 372 SusWrite 419 92% 406 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 31.8 118% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 199 155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6H1 1x16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	33	144	23.6"	1280 720	HXF2360 BPC-M24WHXD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,078x
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	936x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	298x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	232x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	301x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	159x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16