Asus STRIX B250F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 08:17
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 225
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 610
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 37
22% 30.8 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 29
Splatting 26.3
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8ED Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1118 900 828 953 784 759 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 1,349
Mixed 1,319
SusWrite 890
324% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 55.6
186% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 596
423% 544 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 226%
Great: 372%
Apacer AS340 120GB
115GB free
Firmware: AP710PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 48 39 49 45 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 373
Write 329
Mixed 271
SusWrite 71.8
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 21.1
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 59.7
96% 179 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 70%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 68 72 68 69 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 396
Write 223
Mixed 145
SusWrite 86.7
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 15.4
51% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 41.7
48% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
756GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 166 165 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 144
Mixed 104
SusWrite 166
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF424C16BB/8-SP 9905625-065.A00G 24GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 19.4" 1280 720 BNQ8405 BenQ DL2020
Typical STRIX B250F GAMING Builds (Compare 2,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250F GAMING - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback