Oegstone BOAMOT-503

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone BOAMOT-503  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H410M-A
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 15:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$91
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 643
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 66
56% 66.4 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 66.2
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1077
Write 907
Mixed 870
212% 951 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 60.3
211% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 541
436% 612 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 189%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 131 135 128 135 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 116
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 128
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 4R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 16% 76 201 26 100 21.5" 1920 1017 ACR0C83 KA222Q E3
Typical BOAMOT-503 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone BOAMOT-503

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $91
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback