Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 11:54
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 842
77% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 14.6
13% 13.1 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721075SLA360 750GB-$500
508GB free
Firmware: ST4OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 105
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTE723232A7A364 320GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EC2OA70B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 81 90 88 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 86.3
Write 61.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 83.7
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FF 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 3R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 24% 76 120 60 100 21.5" 1920 1017 MSI30B9 MSI MP223
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback