Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '24 at 03:56
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 62.6 2-Core 99.7 48% 77 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 179 21% 165 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 38.2 30% 38.7 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 27.7 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB 5,144 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP6B3PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 148 153 115 115 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 209 Write 85.5 Mixed 345 SusWrite 133 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 26.7 98% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 177 147% 211 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 107%
Seagate ST500DM002 500GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 146GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 89 90 89 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 78.4 Mixed 49 SusWrite 89.1 56% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AID48G26C19UBD 2x8GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 19.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	60	18.5"	1280 720	AOC1970 1970W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H310M-V3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	116x
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	68x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	26x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	26x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	19x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	22x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 14,529 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16