Ciara Q87M-XA

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ciara Q87M-XA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '24 at 23:27
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 94 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 330 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 68.2 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 92.4 56% 75.2 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 47.3 51% 64 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 377 379 394 306 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 190 Write 340 Mixed 238 SusWrite 338 63% 277 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 38.2 125% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 57.8 49% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 123%
MB001000GWFGF 1TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 931GB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 193 198 195 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 179 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 194 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 276% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 16GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.8 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	27"	1280 720	DELA056 DELL U2711

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-XA Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Q87M-XA

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	73x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	24x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	40x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 63%, 2,772 samples	5x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16