Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 22:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 40.1
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 52.7
25% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 80.5
8-Core 87.9
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 84.2
5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 209
Write 151
Mixed 195
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 10.8
42% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 108
83% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 84.6
Mixed 5.2
78% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5603-011.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 15 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4852
Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback